When I started comparing cord-cutting options, the catch on tv price question came down to what each plan actually includes rather than the headline number. A cheap monthly figure means little if the lineup skips the channels you watch every day, so I always check the lineup against my must-have list first. The cord-cutting overview on Wikipedia lays out how these services replaced traditional cable bundles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cord-cutting), which helped me frame the whole comparison.
Multi-connection support is the next thing I price out, since one plan covering two or three screens at once can replace two separate subscriptions in my house. Trial length matters just as much: a real test period on your own device exposes buffering, missing channels, and clumsy apps before you commit to a longer term. Deal roundups and plan comparisons like the ones at Cord Cutters News give a useful baseline for what rival services charge (https://cordcuttersnews.com/), so an outlier price in either direction stands out fast.
That is why I pulled up the catchontv channel list next to the pricing page and matched the sports, news, and international sections against my normal viewing week before deciding anything. A plan earns its price when the lineup, the device apps, and support line up with how you actually watch, not when the number just looks low on the page.